استفاده از هوش مصنوعی برای مدیریت مخاطرات زیست‌محیطی در اکوسیستم‌های کوهستانی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی کاربردی

نویسندگان

1 گروه پژوهشی خشکسالی و تغییر اقلیم، پژوهشکده حفاظت خاک و آبخیزداری، تهران، ایران

2 گروه ریاضی، دانشکده ریاضی، آمار و علوم کامپیوتر، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

3 گروه ژئومورفولوژی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

استفاده از هوش مصنوعی (AI) در مدیریت مخاطرات طبیعی و انسانی مناطق کوهستانی، ظرفیت بالقوه‌ای برای کاهش خسارات و ارتقای تاب‌آوری این مناطق فراهم می‌کند. این پژوهش با مرور مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و ارائه نمونه‌های عملی، به تحلیل کاربرد AI در مدیریت مخاطراتی همچون زمین‌لرزه، حرکات دامنه‌ای، سیلاب، آتش‌سوزی جنگل‌ها، تخریب پوشش گیاهی و توسعه شهری پرداخته است. داده‌های کلی پژوهش بر اساس مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای گردآوری شده، اما در بخش نمونه‌های عملی از تصاویر ماهواره‌ای MODIS،Sentinel-1  و Landsat بهره گرفته شده است. مهم‌ترین ابزارهای تحلیلی مورد استفاده در این پژوهش شامل GMT، TerrSet، سامانه گوگل ارث انجین و ArcGIS بوده‌اند. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که ادغام داده‌های چندمنبعی با مدل‌های هوش مصنوعی توانسته است پیش‌بینی‌هایی دقیق‌تر و سریع‌تر نسبت به روش‌های سنتی ارائه دهد. این قابلیت نه‌تنها موجب افزایش زمان واکنش و امکان صدور هشدارهای زودهنگام شده، بلکه زمینه‌ساز برنامه‌ریزی پیشگیرانه و کاهش خسارات جانی و مالی نیز شده است. برای نمونه، پیش‌بینی سیلاب با مدل‌های LSTM و هشدار زودهنگام زمین‌لغزش با استفاده از شبکه‌های عصبی کانولوشنی (CNN) نمونه‌هایی از این توانمندی‌ها هستند. در حوزه مخاطرات انسانی نیز هوش مصنوعی به‌عنوان یک سامانه هشدار سریع و ابزار تحلیلی پیشرفته عمل کرده است؛ از جمله پایش تغییرات پوشش­گیاهی با شاخص NDVI، شناسایی سریع آتش‌سوزی‌ها با CNN و مدل‌سازی مسیر آلاینده‌ها در آبخوان‌ها، قابلیت‌های این فناوری در حفاظت از اکوسیستم‌های حساس کوهستانی را به‌خوبی نشان می‌دهد. بر اساس نتایج این پژوهش، هوش مصنوعی با قدرت پردازش داده‌های عظیم و شناسایی الگوهای پیچیده، می‌تواند به‌عنوان ابزاری کارآمد و نوآورانه برای پیش‌بینی، پایش و کاهش اثرات مخاطرات طبیعی و انسانی در مناطق کوهستانی به کار گرفته شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Environmental Hazard Management in Mountainous Ecosystems

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maesomeh Asadi 1
  • Maryam Shayestefar 2
  • Hamid Ganjaeian 3
1 Drought and Climate Change Research Group, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.
3 Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in managing natural and human hazards in mountainous areas has the potential to reduce damage and enhance resilience. This study, through a review of library-based studies and practical examples, analyzes the application of AI in managing earthquake hazards, slope movements, floods, forest fires, vegetation degradation, and urban development. The general information in this research is based on library studies, but in the practical examples section, satellite images from MODIS, Sentinel-1, and Landsat were used. The main tools used in this study were GMT, TerrSet, Google Earth Engine, and ArcGIS. In order to examine the effects of artificial intelligence on environmental hazard management in mountainous areas, the study investigates the importance of using this technology in addressing earthquake hazards, landslides, floods, vegetation degradation, fires, physical urban development, and water resource pollution. The results of this study have shown that for natural hazards, artificial intelligence, by integrating multi-source data, has been able to provide more accurate predictions compared to traditional methods. This higher accuracy not only increases response time but also enables preventive planning and reduces human and financial losses. For example, flood prediction with LSTM models and early warning of landslides using CNN are practical examples of these capabilities. In the field of human hazards, AI acts as an advanced analytical tool and early warning system. These include continuous monitoring of vegetation changes with the NDVI index, rapid detection of fires with convolutional neural networks, and modeling of pollutant pathways in aquifers, demonstrating the high capabilities of this technology in protecting sensitive mountain ecosystems. Based on the obtained results, this technology, with its capability to process vast amounts of data and identify complex patterns, can serve as an efficient and innovative tool for predicting, monitoring, and mitigating the impacts of these hazards.
 
Extended Abstract
 
Introduction
The mountainous regions of the country, particularly the Alborz and Zagros Mountain ranges, with their complex geological characteristics, steep slopes, diverse vegetation cover, and specific climatic conditions, are prone to incidents that not only cause considerable human and financial losses but also threaten the stability of sensitive ecosystems. Managing these hazards requires precise tools for prediction, monitoring, and decision-making that can analyze diverse environmental, climatic, and human data and provide practical solutions for risk reduction. In recent decades, significant advances in data processing technologies and machine learning algorithms have made artificial intelligence one of the most efficient tools for crisis management. With its ability to process massive volumes of data in short timeframes, extract complex patterns, and predict nonlinear phenomena, artificial intelligence can play an effective role in various stages of risk management from prevention and forecasting to response and recovery in mountainous areas. The input data for these systems may include remote sensing information, ground-based sensor data, hydrological models, meteorological data, and even social and economic data. The application of artificial intelligence in managing natural and human hazards in mountainous areas covers a wide range. Despite these advantages, the full utilization of AI’s potential in managing hazards in Iran’s mountainous regions requires overcoming challenges such as the absence of integrated data infrastructure, limited access to high-quality data, the need for localized algorithms, and the shortage of skilled human resources. Therefore, the present study aims to review and analyze the role of artificial intelligence in managing various natural and human hazards in the country’s mountainous areas, and by identifying capacities, limitations, and successful examples, offer practical solutions to enhance the resilience of these regions.
 
Methodology
This study was designed to develop and evaluate an artificial intelligence framework for predicting and managing natural hazards in mountainous regions. The general information in this research was based on library studies; however, in the practical examples section, satellite images from MODIS, Sentinel-1, and Landsat were used. The main tools employed in this research included GMT (for preparing maps of ground surface changes), TerrSet (for preparing maps of settlement areas and predicting their physical development trends), Google Earth Engine (for preparing maps of flooded areas and vegetation cover), and ArcGIS (for preparing output maps). In this study, to examine the impacts of artificial intelligence in managing environmental hazards in mountainous regions, the importance of using this technology was investigated in relation to earthquake hazards, landslides, floods, vegetation degradation, wildfires, urban physical development, and water resource pollution. It should be noted that for the topics of earthquakes, floods, vegetation degradation, and urban physical development, practical examples were provided.
 
Results and Discussion
The conducted investigations showed that Artificial Intelligence (AI) can play a key role in managing a wide range of natural and human-induced hazards in Iran’s mountainous regions. In the field of earthquakes, the use of deep neural networks and reinforcement learning algorithms, combined with seismological data, GPS, radar imagery (InSAR), and hydrogeochemical data, enables the identification of earthquake precursors and the assessment of crustal stress. For landslides, algorithms such as Random Forest and Convolutional Neural Networks, utilizing spatial and environmental data, generate susceptibility maps and short-term warnings. Regarding floods, LSTM models and satellite rainfall data (GPM and TRMM), along with IoT sensors, provide early prediction and warning capabilities. In managing human-induced hazards, machine learning algorithms and computer vision are effectively used to monitor vegetation cover changes (NDVI), predict wildfires, model water pollution pathways, and analyze urban development. However, challenges such as the lack of integrated data infrastructure, insufficient high-quality data, the need for localized algorithms, and a shortage of specialized personnel are major obstacles to fully leveraging AI capabilities.
Conclusion
The results of this study indicate that integrating AI into the management of natural and human-induced hazards can significantly enhance resilience, reduce damages, and improve decision-making in Iran’s mountainous regions. AI-based approaches, capable of simultaneously analyzing multi-source data, identifying complex patterns, and providing accurate predictions, can fill the gaps in traditional methods. Despite these advantages, realizing the full potential of AI requires overcoming existing barriers. First, establishing a national integrated database, including seismological, meteorological, remote sensing, and spatial information with open access for researchers, is essential. Second, developing localized algorithms compatible with Iran’s specific geological and climatic conditions should be prioritized. Third, investment in training and educating specialized personnel in AI, remote sensing, and GIS can address skill shortages. Additionally, inter-organizational collaboration among research centers, disaster management agencies, universities, and the private sector should be strengthened to use existing capacities in a coordinated manner. Implementing pilot projects in high-risk areas to practically evaluate AI models and deploy real-time data-based early warning systems is also recommended. Finally, the expansion of AI use should align with sustainable development approaches, considering environmental and social aspects, to reduce risks while protecting sensitive mountain ecosystems.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Environmental Management
  • Environmental Risks
  • Mountainous Territories
ابدالی، یعقوب؛ رمضانی حاجی‌محله، عارفه و معینی‌نسب، محسن. (۱۴۰۲). تحلیل راهبردی تاب‌آوری پیراشهری در برابر مخاطرات محیطی (مورد مطالعه: نواحی پیراشهری سنندج). توسعه فضاهای پیراشهری، ۵(۲)، ۱۸۱–۲۰۲. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpusd.2023.366233.1237
ابدالی، یعقوب؛ زنگنه‌شهرکی، سعید؛ حاتمی‌نژاد، حسین؛ پوراحمد، احمد و سلمانی، محمد. (۱۴۰۳). سنجش تاب‌آوری شهری در برابر مخاطره سیل با استفاده از شاخص‌های ترکیبی (مورد مطالعه: شهر خرم‌آباد). فصلنامه مطالعات شهری، ۱۳(۵۰)، ۶۱–۷۶. https://doi.org/10.34785/J011.2022.021
اسدی، معصومه؛ حیدری، زهرا و امامی، کامیار. (۱۴۰۱). ارزیابی روند توسعه فیزیکی شهر پلدختر به سمت مناطق سیل‌خیز. جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی، ۱۱(۲)، ۱۵۹–۱۷۴. https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2021.72169.1101
اصغری سراسکانرود، صیاد؛ صادقی، ابوذر؛ سلیمانی، حمید و اکبری، نسا. (۱۴۰۴). بررسی تغییرات پوشش گیاهی و دمای سطح زمین در شهرستان رشت. پژوهش‌های تغییرات آب‌وهوایی، ۶(۲۱)، ۸۷–۱۰۴. https://doi.org/10.30488/ccr.2025.484698.1252
جمینی، داود؛ جوان، فرهاد و آتش بهار، رامین. (1405). هوش مصنوعی و گردشگری روستایی (مطالعه‌ای کاربردی در مناطق نمونه گردشگری). فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، 21(73)، 354-315. https://doi.org/10.22054/tms.2025.85190.3055
جوان، فرهاد؛ جمینی، داود و آتش بهار، رامین. (1405). کاربرد الگوریتم‌های یادگیری ماشین در مدیریت خطر سیلاب با تأکید بر سکونتگاه‌های روستایی گردشگرپذیر (مطالعه موردی: منطقه نمونه گردشگری بیستون، استان کرمانشاه). جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی، 15(1)، 250-226. https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2025.95982.1616
حیدری‌فر، محمدرئوف؛ سلیمانی‌راد، اسماعیل و حسینی‌سیاه‌گلی، مهناز. (1399). بررسی نقش مخاطرات طبیعی و مدیریت بحران در آمایش سرزمین (مطالعه موردی: استان کرمانشاه). مطالعات توسعه پایدار شهری و منطقه‌ای، 1(1)، 55–76. https://www.srds.ir/article_122918.html
صابری‌فر، رستم. (1404). واکاوی تأثیرات تغییر کاربری اراضی بر پوشش گیاهی و دمای سطحی شهر و واکنش مدیران شهری به این روند (نمونه موردی: شهر مشهد). فصلنامه مطالعات توسعه پایدار شهری و منطقه‌ای، 6(1)، 68–83. https://www.srds.ir/article_213418.html
صداقتی، عاطفه؛ مداحی، علی و طالب‌خواه، حمید. (1401). مدل‌سازی و پیش‌بینی روند گسترش و توسعه فیزیکی شهر بجنورد. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 54(4)، 1563–1585. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2021.329110.1008364
علی‌نژاد امامقلی، کوروش؛ احمدیان، محمدعلی و قنبرزاده‌دربان، هادی. (۱۳۹۹). راهکارهای کاهش مخاطرات طبیعی در سازمان‌های مرتبط با مدیریت بحران (مورد: سکونتگاه‌های پیراشهری قوچان). توسعه فضاهای پیراشهری، ۲(۲)، ۳۳–۵۰. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.26764164.1399.2.2.3.2
کاظمی، رحیم و پرهمت، جهانگیر. (1400). تحلیل عامل‌های مؤثر بر شدت سیل‌خیزی در ایران. پژوهش‌های آبخیزداری، 34(1)، 59–73. https://doi.org/10.22092/wmej.2020.342597.1330
گودرزی، مجید و ابراهیمی، اعظم. (1402). ارزیابی روند توسعه فیزیکی شهر ایذه با استفاده از مدل LCM. جغرافیا و روابط انسانی، 6(2)، 411–424. https://doi.org/10.22034/gahr.2023.387212.1823
گورابی، ابوالقاسم و امامی، کامیار. (1396). تأثیرات نوزمینساخت بر تغییرات مورفولوژیک حوضه‌های زهکشی سواحل مکران، جنوب شرق ایران. پژوهش­های ژئومورفولوژی کمی، 6(1)، 89-74. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22519424.1396.6.1.5.2
نصرتی، مژگان؛ خضری، سعید و کاظمی، آفاق. (1401). بررسی و تحلیل مخاطرات طبیعی و مسائل انسانی و محیطی شهر سنندج به‌منظور ارائه راهکارهای مناسب. جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی، 11(1)، 99–115. https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2021.71620.1092
یعقوب‌نژاد اصل، نازیلا. (۱۴۰۲). نقش ژئومورفولوژی در مخاطرات طبیعی، آسیب‌پذیری و پیشگیری از بلایای طبیعی در کشور ایران. جغرافیا و روابط انسانی، ۵(۴)، ۲۳۱-۲۶۱. https://doi.org/10.22034/gahr.2022.368878.1761
Al Awadh, M., & Mallick, J. (2024). A decision-making framework for landfill site selection in Saudi Arabia using explainable artificial intelligence and multi-criteria analysis. Environmental Technology & Innovation33, 103464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103464
Alotaibi, E., & Nassif, N. (2024). Artificial intelligence in environmental monitoring: in-depth analysis. Discov Artif Intell 4, 84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00198-1
Asha, P., Natrayan, L., Geetha, B.T., Beulah, J.R., Sumathy, R., Varalakshmi, G., & Neelakandan, S. (2022). IoT enabled environmental toxicology for air pollution monitoring using AI techniques. Environ Res, 205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112574
Asim, K., Idris, A., Iqbal, T., & Martínez-Álvarez, F. (2018). Earthquake prediction model using support vector regressor and hybrid neural networks. PLOS One. 13(7). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199004
Atashpanjeh, H., Behfar, A., Haverkamp, C., Verdoes, M.M., & Al-Ameen, M.N. (2022). Intermediate help with using digital devices and online accounts: understanding the needs, expectations, and vulnerabilities of young adults. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05563-8_1
Atashpanjeh, H., Paudel, R., & Al-Ameen, M.N. (2025). Mental model-based designs: the study in privacy policy landscape. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 41(12), 7253-7272.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2392064
Behfar, A., Atashpanjeh, H., & Al-Ameen, M.N. (2023). Can password meter be more effective towards user attention, engagement, and attachment?: a study of metaphor-based designs. In Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1145/3584931.3606983
Bhatia, M., Ahanger, T.A., & Manocha, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence based real-time earthquake prediction. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105856
Bostan, T. (2024). Generating a landslide susceptibility map using integrated meta-heuristic optimization and machine learning models. Sustainability, 16. 9396. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219396
Chapi, K., Singh, V.P., Shirzadi, A., Shahabi, H., Bui, D.T., Pham, B.T., & Khosravi, K. A. (2017). novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach for flood susceptibility assessment. Environ Model Softw, 95, 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.012.
Dumaru, P., Atashpanjeh, H., & Al-Ameen, M.N. (2024). It's hard for him to make choices sometimes and he needs guidance": Re-orienting Parental Control for Children. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 8, no. CSCW1. 1-51. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637359
Dumaru, P., Shrestha, A., Paudel, R., Behfar, A., Atashpanjeh, H., & Al-Ameen, M.N. (2023). I have learned that things are different here”: Understanding the transitional challenges with technology use after relocating to the USA. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 201-220. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35936-1_15
Grzybowski, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: Promises, Hazards and Challenges. In: Grzybowski, A. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-83756-2_1
Halder, S., Bose, S., 2024. Sustainable flood hazard mapping with GLOF: A Google Earth Engine approach. Natural Hazards Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nhres.2024.01.002
Hussain, M.A., Chen, Z., Zhou, Y., Meena, S.R., Ali, N., &  Ullah Shah, S. (2025). Landslide susceptibility mapping using artificial intelligence models: a case study in the Himalayas. Landslides, 22, 2089–2103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-025-02466-2
Jabeen, F.Al Zaidi, S.و & Al Dhaheri, M.H. (2022), Automation and artificial intelligence in hospitality and tourism, Tourism Review, 77(4), 1043-1061. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-09-2019-0360
Jiang, W., Xi, J., Li, Z., Zang, M., Chen, B., Zhang, C., Liu, Z., Gao, S., Zhu, W. (2022). Deep Learning for Landslide Detection and Segmentation in High-Resolution Optical Images along the Sichuan-Tibet Transportation Corridor. Remote Sens, 14, 5490. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14215490
Jong, F. C., Ahmed, M. M., Lau, W. K., & Lee, H. A. D. (2022). A new hybrid Artificial Intelligence (AI) approach for hydro energy sites selection and integration. Heliyon8(9). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(22)01926-0?uuid=uuid%3A8860613e-c822-4283-9d2a-3c122c292002
Knani, M., Echchakoui, S., & Ladhari, R. (2022). Artificial intelligence in tourism and hospitality: Bibliometric analysis and research agenda. International Journal of Hospitality Management107, 103317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103317
Kuhaneswaran, B., Chamanee, G., & Kumara, B. T. G. S. (2025). A comprehensive review on the integration of geographic information systems and artificial intelligence for landfill site selection: A systematic mapping perspective. Waste Management & Research43(2), 137-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X241237100
Liu, Y., Huang, X., & Liu, Y. (2024). Detection of long-term land use and ecosystem services dynamics in the Loess Hilly-Gully region based on artificial intelligence and multiple models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141560
Meng, L., Yan, Y., Jing, H., Baloch, M.Y.J., Du, S.Y., & Du, S. (2024). Large-scale groundwater pollution risk assessment research based on artificial intelligence technology: A case study of Shenyang City in Northeast China. Ecological Indicators, 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112915
Nghia, B.P.Q., Pal, I., Chollacoop, N., Mukhopadhyay, A., 2022. Applying Google earth engine for flood mapping and monitoring in the downstream provinces of Mekong River. Progress in Disaster Science, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100235
 Pwavodi, J., Ibrahim, A.U., Pwavodi, P.C., Al-Turjman, F., & Mohand-Said , A. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence and IoT in prediction of earthquakes: Review. Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiig.2024.100075
Shahabi, H., Jamini, D., Shirzadi, A., Sadeghi, H., Komasi, H., Elkhrachy, I., Salvati, A., Clague, J.J., & Ghaderi, Z. (2026). Spatiotemporal dynamics of geotourism resilience: Machine learning methodologies and key insights. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 14(1), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2026.02.004
Singh, P., Maurya, V., Dwivedi, R. (2021). Pixel-based landslide identification using Landsat 8 and GEE. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci.-ISPRS Arch43, 721–726. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-721-2021
Sy, H.M., Luu, C., Bui, Q.D., Ha, H., Nguyen, D.Q., 2023. Urban flood risk assessment using Sentinel-1 on the google earth engine: A case study in Thai Nguyen city, Vietnam. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2023.100987
Tahernejad, A., Sahebi, A., Abadi, A.S.S., & Safari. M. (2024). Application of artificial intelligence in triage in emergencies and disasters: a systematic review. BMC Public Health, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20447-3
Tang, Y., Sun,Y., Han, Z., Soomro, S., Tan, B., & Hu, C. (2023). Flood forecasting based on machine learning pattern recognition and dynamic migration of parameters. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101406
Wu, Z., Wang, B., Li, M., Tian, Y., Quan, Y., & Liu, J. (2022). Simulation of forest fire spread based on artificial intelligence. Ecological Indicators, 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108653
Zahabnazouri, S., Belmont, P., David, S., Wigand, P. E., Elia, M., & Capolongo, D. (2025). Detecting Burn Severity and Vegetation Recovery After Fire Using dNBR and dNDVI Indices: Insight from the Bosco Difesa Grande, Gravina in Southern Italy. Sensors, 25(10), 3097. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25103097