ارایه الگوی تحقق‌پذیری زیست‌پذیری در محیط‌های شهری (مورد مطالعه: شهر همدان)

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی کاربردی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه سیدجمال‌لدین اسدآبادی، اسدآباد، ایران

2 دکترا، گروه عمران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تهران مرکز، تهران، ایران

10.22034/ermr.2025.144219.1027

چکیده

تحقق زیست‌پذیری شهری به ارتقای کیفیت زیست شهروندان، کاهش آلودگی، افزایش سلامت جسمی و روانی شهروندان، تسهیل مدیریت پایدار منابع و کاهش تأثیرات تغییرات اقلیمی منجر می‌شود. با توجه به رشد جمعیت، گسترش شهر، تغییرات اقلیمی و مسائل مرتبط با آب، آلودگی و فرونشست زمین، توجه به زیست­پذیری شهری همدان، ضرورت دارد. از این‌رو، هدف پژوهش حاضر، ارائه الگوی تحقق­پذیری زیست­پذیری شهری در شهر همدان است. پژوهش حاضر از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از نظر روش، کیفی است و برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها، از روش گراندد تئوری کوربین و اشتراوس استفاده نموده است. جامعۀ آماری متشکل از نخبگان حوزۀ برنامه­ریزی شهری، مدیریت شهری، شهرسازی، محیط‌زیست و توسعه پایدار است. روش نمونه­گیری به صورت نمونه­گیری هدفمند و تا سطح اشباع نظری ادامه یافته است. در مجموع از نظرات 15 نفر از نخبگان استفاده شده است. نتایج پژوهش بیانگر، 6 کد گزینشی، 34 کد محوری و 142 کد باز است. در نتیجه، تحقق­پذیری زیست­پذیری در شهر همدان نیازمند توجه به شرایط زمینه‌ای (پتانسیل و موقعیت جغرافیایی، شخصیت تاریخی و زیرساخت)، شرایط علّی (ابعاد محیطی، اجتماعی و اقتصادی) و شرایط مداخله‌گر است که با استفاده از اهرم­های عملیاتی نظیر فضاهای باز، حمل­و­نقل پایدار، آموزش و سلامت و کاربری زمین موجب بهبود کیفیت زیستی و مکانی و تقویت احساس تعلق مکانی می­شوند. سیاست­گذاری و حکمروایی مبتنی بر نوآوری و فناوری نیز نقش مهمی در ارتقای زیرساخت­ها، افزایش فضاهای باز و پاسداشت هویت تاریخی شهر همدان، هم­افزایی میرات تاریخی ـ فرهنگی و نیازهای شهری معاصر دارد. در نهایت، تحقق­پذیری زیست­پذیری در شهر همدان به ایجاد تعادل بین توسعۀ پایدار، هویت تاریخی و حکمروایی فناورانه منجر می‌گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Pattern Presentation for the Feasibility of Urban Livability (Case Study: Hamedan City)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hafez Mahdnejad 1
  • Majid Kianpour 2
1 Associate professor, Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Said Jamaldin University of Asadabadi, Asadabad, Iran
2 PhD, Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Central Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Considering population growth, urban expansion, climate change, and issues related to water, pollution, and land subsidence, it is necessary to pay attention to urban livability in Hamedan. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to present a pattern for the feasibility of urban livability in Hamedan. The present study is applied in terms of purpose and qualitative in terms of method, which uses Corbin and Strauss's grounded theory. The statistical population consists of elites in the fields of urban planning, urban management, urban development, environment, and sustainable development. The sampling method was purposive sampling up to the theoretical saturation level, and 15 elites were used. The results of the study indicate that there are 6 selective codes, 34 axial codes, and 142 open codes.As a result, the realization of livability in the city of Hamedan requires attention to the contextual conditions (potential and geographical location, historical character and infrastructure), causal conditions (environmental, social and economic dimensions) and intervening conditions that, by using operational levers such as open spaces, sustainable transportation, education and health and land use, improve the quality of life and space and strengthen the sense of place. Policy-making and governance based on innovation and technology also play an important role in improving infrastructure, increasing open spaces and preserving the historical identity of the city of Hamedan, and synergizing the historical-cultural heritage and contemporary urban needs. Finally, the realization of livability in the city of Hamedan involves creating a balance between sustainable development, historical identity and technological governance.


 
Extended Abstract
 
Introduction
Meanwhile, Hamedan, as one of the important historical and cultural cities of the country, has faced environmental, social, and economic problems such as water supply, land subsidence, pollution, traffic, urban sprawl, growth of informal settlements, and informal economy, etc. At the same time, urban livability has been proposed as an important criterion for evaluating a city's ability to provide suitable conditions for a healthy, safe, and desirable life for its citizens. However, the lack of a comprehensive model for the realization of urban livability has reduced the efficiency of urban policies and programs, resulting in the failure to achieve sustainable development. Accordingly, it is necessary to present a model for the realization of urban livability in Hamedan, taking into account its multidimensional and complex dimensions, including social, economic, and environmental dimensions. Therefore, the present study seeks to present a livability model to fill the gap between theory and practice in the field of urban livability, and in this direction focuses on providing operational strategies and solutions.
 
Methodology
The present study is applied in terms of purpose and qualitative in terms of method, using Corbin and Strauss's grounded theory. Corbin and Strauss's grounded theory method is an appropriate method for presenting a model of urban viability in Hamedan due to its flexibility and focus on field data. The statistical population consists of elites in the fields of urban planning, urban management, urban development, environment, and sustainable development. The sampling method was purposive sampling up to the theoretical saturation level, and 15 elites who had rich information about the research topic were used. In fact, the interviews continued until new data added significant information to the research findings. The research tool was a semi-structured interview. In addition, secondary documents and sources in the field of urban viability, such as existing sources and documents, were also used. Data analysis was conducted based on Strauss and Corbin's three-stage structure. The first stage is related to open coding. Accordingly, the raw data were divided into smaller units and primary codes were extracted. In other words, at this stage, the data were divided into primary concepts. The second stage is axial coding, in which the primary codes were aggregated into larger categories and the relationships between them were identified. In other words, at this stage, the concepts were organized around the main axes. The third stage is selective coding. On this basis, a central concept was selected that connected all the categories and relationships. In other words, the main concepts were identified that linked all the data. This process led to the development of a theoretical model for the realization of livability in the city of Hamedan.
 
Results and Discussion
The model for the realization of urban livability in Hamadan consists of background conditions, causal conditions, intervening conditions, pivotal components, strategies, and consequences or results. The most important background conditions for the realization of urban livability in Hamadan are: geographical potential, historical character, population structure, and infrastructure. The most important causal conditions for the realization of urban livability in Hamadan are: environmental, economic, and social. The most important pivotal components for the realization of urban livability in Hamadan are: cultural and leisure facilities, open spaces and parks, transportation, housing, education and health, community facilities, surrounding environment, and land use. The most important strategies for the realization of urban livability in Hamadan are: infrastructure and facilities, green spaces, preserving the city's identity and historical background, sustainable housing, security and safety, economic vitality, sense of community, educational and health facilities. The most important conditions for the realization of urban livability in Hamedan are: governance, and technology and innovation. The most important results for the realization of urban livability in Hamedan are: improving infrastructure and services, increasing green space per capita and environmental quality, preserving historical and cultural identity, developing technological infrastructure, green housing, sustainable urban security, economic development, a sense of place, and improving educational and health infrastructure.
Conclusion
The realization of urban livability in Hamedan requires a multidimensional and complex system. Background conditions such as potential and geographical location, historical character, and infrastructure provide a favorable context and a fundamental role for the realization of urban livability. In this regard, causal conditions provide the necessary stimuli for the realization of urban livability in Hamedan and require the adoption of a coordinated and integrated approach. In fact, urban livability requires simultaneous attention to environmental, social, and economic dimensions. Intervening conditions indicate the importance of policymaking, planning, and urban management based on technology and innovation in the realization of urban livability in Hamedan. Competent governance based on innovative technologies plays an important role in solving challenges and problems and facilitating the livability process. Pivotal components and strategies play a key role in the realization of urban livability in Hamedan. Components such as open spaces, sustainable transportation, education and health, and land use act as operational levers that directly affect the improvement of the quality of life of citizens. The strategies presented in the field of improving infrastructure, increasing open spaces, and preserving the historical identity of Hamedan city indicate the integration and combination of cultural and historical heritage with the needs of modern urban life. The realization of these strategies leads to the improvement of the quality of life of citizens, an increase in the sense of security, sustainable development, and an increase in the sense of place. Therefore, the realization of urban livability depends on integrated urban planning and attention to all components and strategies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sustainable urbanism
  • livability
  • livable city
  • Hamedan city
  1. Ahmed, N.O., El-Halafawy, A.M., & Amin, A.M. (2019). A Critical Review of Urban Livability. European Journal of Sustainable Development 8(1), 165-182. Doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n1p165.
  2. Alijani, S., Pourahmad, A., Hatami Nejad, H., Ziari, K., & Sodoudi, S. (2020). A New Approach of Urban Livability in Tehran: Thermal Comfort as a Primitive Indicator. Case Study, District 22. Urban Climate, 33(2020), 100656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100656.
  3. Allen, N., O’donnell, G., & Kennerley, T .(2021). Creating improved housing outcomes: Liveable medium- density housing residents’ survey. September 2021. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32917.45285
  4. Altrock, U .(2022). Urban livability in socially disadvantaged neighborhoods: The experience of the German program “socially integrative city”. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(5), 783-794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.12.006.
  5. Basu, T., Das, A., & Pereira, P. (2021). Urban livability index assessment based on land-use changes in an Indian medium-sized city (Raiganj). Geocarto International, 37(25), 8495–8519. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.2002427.
  6. Beames, A., Broekx, S., Schneidewind, U., Landuyt, D., van der Meulen, M., Heijungs, R., & Seuntjens, P. (2018). Amenity proximity analysis for sustainable brownfield redevelopment planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 171(2018), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.003.
  7. Bedi, C., Kansal, A., & Mukheibir, P .(2023). A conceptual framework for the assessment of and the transition to liveable, sustainable and equitable cities. Environmental Science & Policy, 140, 134-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.11.018.
  8. Bo, F., Danlin, Y., & Yaojun, Z .(2019). The livable urban landscape: GIS and remote sensing extracted land use assessment for urban livability in Changchun Proper, China. Land Use Policy, 87(2019), 104048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104048.
  9. Davern, M., Both, A., Murray, K., Roberts, R., & Norzahari, F. (2023). Liveability research creating real world impact: connecting urban planning and public health through the Australian Urban Observatory. Cities & Health, 7(5), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2023.2178091.
  10. Giles-Corti, B., Saghapour, T., Turrell, G., Gunn, L., Both, A., Lowe, M., Rozek, J., Roberts, R., Hooper, P., Butt, A., & Higgs, C .(2022). Spatial and socioeconomic inequities in liveability in Australia’s 21 largest cities: Does city size matter?. Health & Place, 78(2022), 102899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102899.
  11. Gough, M. Z . (2015). Reconciling Livability and Sustainability: Conceptual and Practical Implications for Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(2), 145–160. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X15570320.
  12. Hedayatnezhad Kashi, S., Sharifi, A., Azari, M. & Tabrizi, N .(2025). Spatial analysis and ranking of urban districts based on a comprehensive livability approach: the case of Tehran. GeoJournal, 90(2025), 216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-025-11465-8.
  13. Higgs, C., Badland, H., Simons, K., Knibbs , L. D., & Giles‑Corti, B. (2019). The Urban Liveability Index: developing a policy-relevant urban liveability composite measure and evaluating associations with transport mode choice. International Journal of Health Geographics, 18(14). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-019-0178-8.
  14. Jacobs, J .(2002). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Vintage Books: New York City.
  15. Jodder, P.K., Hossain, M.Z., & Thill, J.-C. (2025). Urban Livability in a Rapidly Urbanizing Mid-Size City: Lessons for Planning in the Global South. Sustainability, 17(2025), 1504. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041504.
  16. Kaal, H. (2011). A conceptual history of livability: Dutch scientists, politicians, policy makers and citizens and the quest for a livable city. City, 15(5), 532–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.595094.
  17. Kashef, M .(2016). Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries. Frontiers of Architectural Research, , 5(2), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2016.03.003.
  18. Khorrami, K., Mirzaee, M., Fadakar Davarani, M. M., & Khanjani, N .(2021). Measuring Liveability in Iranian Cities Using the Global Liveable City Index (GLCI). Health Scope, 10(2), e112409. doi: 10.5812/jhealthscope.112409.
  19. Kovacs-Györi, A., & Cabrera-Barona, P. (2019). Assessing urban livability through residential preference-An international survey. DATA, 4(2019), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/data4040134
  20. Lang, W., Chen, T., Chan, E. H. W., Yung, E. H. K., & Lee, T. C. F. (2019). Understanding livable dense urban form for shaping the landscape of community facilities in Hong Kong using fine-scale measurements. Cities, 84(2019), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.07.003
  21. Li, M. & Fan, Z. (2025). Constructing High-Quality Livable Cities: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Urban Street Livability Using an Approach Based on Human Needs Theory, Street View Images, and Deep Learning. Land, 14(2025), 1095. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/land14051095.
  22. Liang, L., Deng, X., Wang, P., Wang, Z., & Wang, L. (2020). Assessment of the impact of climate change on cities livability in China. Science of The Total Environment, 726(2020), 138339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138339.
  23. Liu, Y., Li, J., & Yang, Y .(2018). Strategic adjustment of land use policy under the economic transformation. Land Use Policy, 74(2018), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.005.
  24. Long, Y., Wu, Y., Huang, L., Aleksejeva, J., Iossifova, D., Dong, N., Gasparatos, A . (2024). Assessing urban livability in Shanghai through an open source data-driven approach. npj Urban Sustain, 4 (7), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-024-00146-z.
  25. Lowe, M., Arundel, J., Hooper, P., Rozek, J., Higgs, C., Roberts, R., & Giles-Corti, B .(2020). Liveability aspirations and realities: Implementation of urban policies designed to create healthy cities in Australia. Social Science & Medicine, 245(2020), 112713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112713.
  26. Macmillan, A., Smith, M., Witten, K., Woodward, A., Hosking, J., Wild, K., & Field, A. (2020). Suburblevel changes for active transport to meet the SDGs: Causal theory and a New Zealand case study. Science of the Total Environment, 714(2020), 136678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136678.
  27. Magnuszewski, J., Beecham, R. & Burns, L. (2025). The Auckland Urban Liveability Index: A Mechanism for Quantifying and Evaluating Modern Urban Densification. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 18(2025), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-025-09643-9.
  28. Mansour, H. M .(2016). Liveable urban areas and new housing typologies. A Case Study In Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal. Master in SpatialL Planning and Urban Project, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Porto.
  29. Martino, N., Girling, C., & Lu, Y. (2021). Urban form and liveability: socioeconomic and built environment indicators. Buildings and Cities, 2(1),220-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bc.82
  30. McCann, E. (2007). Inequality and politics in the creative city-region: questions of livability and state strategy. International Journal of Urban & Regional Research, 31(2007), 188-196. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00713.x.
  31. Medayese, S., Magidimisha-Chipingu, , & Chipungu, L .(2021). Conceptual nexus of urban liveability and sustainability. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 654 (2021), 012027. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/654/1/012027.
  32. Mouratidis, K., & Yiannakou, A .(2022). What makes cities livable? Determinants of neighborhood satisfaction and neighborhood happiness in different contexts. Land Use Policy, 112(2022), 105855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105855.
  33. Newman, P. W. G. (1999). Sustainability and Cities: Extending the Metabolism Model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 44(4), 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00009-2.
  34. Norouzian-Maleki, S., Bell, S., Hosseini, S.-B. & Faizi, M. (2015). Developing and testing a framework for the assessment of neighbourhood liveability in two contrasting countries: Iran and Estonia. Ecological Indicators. 48(2015), 263–271, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.033.
  35. Othman, I. W., Pullong, A., & Maidin, I. (2022). The Enhancement Of The Concept Of Liveability And Inclusive Community In Relation To Sustainable Development. Journal of Tourism Hospitality and Environment Management, 7 (29), 294-313. DOI: 10.35631/JTHEM.729020.
  36. Paul, A. (2020). Developing a methodology for assessing livability potential: an evidence from a metropolitan urban agglomeration (MUA) in Kolkata, India. Habitat International. 105(2020), 102263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102263.
  37. Paul, A., & Sen, J .(2018). Livability assessment within a metropolis based on the impact of integrated urban geographic factors (IUGFs) on clustering urban centers of Kolkata. Cities, 74(2018), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.015
  38. Paul, A., & Sen, J. (2020). A critical review of liveability approaches and their dimensions. Geoforum, 117(2020), 90-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.008.
  39. Raiyn, J .(2025). Enhancing Urban Livability: Exploring the Impact of on-Demand Shared CCAM Shuttle Buses on City Life. Transport and Telecommunication, 26(3), 223-236. DOI 10.2478/ttj-2025-0017.
  40. Rajesha, C .R., & Chandrashekara, B .(2025). Exploring Urban Liveability: Frameworks and Approaches for Sustainable Cities. Quest Journals Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 13(3), 31-38. DOI: 10.35629/9467-13033138.
  41. Reid, S., Kraatz, J., & Caldera, S. (2024). A liveability framework for medium to high density social and affordable housing: An Australian housing case study. Urban Policy and Research, 42(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2024.2323013.
  42. Ruszczyk, H. A., Halligey, A., Rahman, M. F., & Ahmed, I. (2023). Liveability and vitality: An exploration of small cities in Bangladesh. Cities, 133(2023), 104150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104150.
  43. Saeed, U., Ahmad, S.R., Mohey-ud-din, G., Butt, H.J., & Ashraf, U. (2022). An Integrated Approach for Developing an Urban Livability Composite Index—A Cities’ Ranking Road Map to Achieve Urban Sustainability. Sustainability, 14(2022), 8755. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su14148755.
  44. Schindler, M., & Dionisio, R. (2024). Planning for Urban Livability: Integrating Socio-Spatial Indicators in City-Making. Journal of Urban Technology31(3), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2024.2391889.
  45. Tariq Sheikh, W., & van Ameijde, J.(2022). Promoting Livability Through Urban Planning: A Comprehensive Framework Based on the “Theory of Human Needs. Cities, 131(2022), 103972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103972.
  46. Tolfo, G., & Doucet, B .(2022). Livability for whom?: Planning for livability and the gentrification of memory in Vancouver. Cities, 123(2022), 103564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103564.
  47. Valcárcel-Aguiar, B., & Murias, P .( 2019). Evaluation and Management of Urban Liveability: A Goal Programming Based Composite Indicator. Social Indicators Research, 142(2019), 689–712. doi:10.1007/s11205-018-1861-z.
  48. Wang, Y., & Miao, Z .(2022). Towards the analysis of urban livability in China: spatial–temporal changes, regional types, and influencing factors. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(40),1-20. DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-20092-6.
  49. Xiao, Y., Chai, J., Wang, R., & Huang, H. (2020). Assessment and key factors of urban liveability in underdeveloped regions: A case study of the Loess Plateau, China. Sustainable Cities and Society. 79(2022), 103674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103674.
  50. Yu, J., Li, X., Guan, X., & Shen, H. (2022). A remote sensing assessment index for urban ecological livability and its application. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 27(2), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2022.2072775.
  51. Zhan, D. S, Kwan, M. P., Zhang, W. Z, Fan, J., Yu, J. H, & Dang, Y. X. (2018). Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China. Cities, 79, 92-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.02.
  52. Zhang, Q., Nie, H., & Li, X. (2024). Evaluation of Urban Space Livability in the Urban Area of Hefei based on Production-Living-Ecological Space. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 15(2), 338-350. https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2024.02.009.
  53. Zhang, W. Z. (2016). The core framework of the livable city construction. Geographical Research, 35(2), 205-213. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj201602001
  54. Zhu, L., Guo, Y., Zhang, C., Meng, J., Ju, L., Zhang, Y., & Tang, W. (2020). Assessing community-level livability using combined remote sensing and internet-based big geospatial data. Remote Sensing, 12(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244026.