Assessment of the Vulnerability of Mountainous Villages to Natural Hazards (Case Study: Izeh and Andika Counties)

Document Type : applied research

Authors

1 Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch, Ahvaz, Iran.

3 Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Humanities, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran.

Abstract

Earthquakes and landslides are among the most significant natural hazards worldwide, causing extensive damage to infrastructure, the environment, and human communities each year. Northern regions of Khuzestan Province are among the areas exposed to these hazards. Given the importance of the issue, this study aims to identify vulnerable areas to landslides and earthquakes in the counties of Izeh and Andika in Khuzestan Province. The main data sources used in this research include CHIRPS and MODIS satellite imagery, the 30-meter SRTM digital elevation model, and the 1:100,000 geological digital map of the region. The main tools employed were Google Earth Engine, ArcGIS, and IDRISI. In this study, a hybrid model combining the Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) and relative weight coefficients was used to assess the vulnerability of the villages in the region to landslides and earthquakes. According to the results, 85.3% of the villages in the area have a high vulnerability to earthquakes, and 9.7% to landslides. Additionally, about 9% of the villages are simultaneously threatened by both hazards. This highlights the urgent need for special attention to rural infrastructure and risk-based planning in these areas. The findings also indicate that Andika County has a higher density of villages vulnerable to both hazards. Based on the obtained results, it is recommended that comprehensive measures be taken to reduce vulnerability in the counties of Izeh and Andika, including the reinforcement of rural buildings using government facilities and public participation, the development and deployment of early warning systems, and the training of local residents in preparedness and crisis management.
 
Extended Abstract
 
Introduction
Iran, located within the seismically active Alpine-Himalayan belt, has a high seismic potential, which has placed many of its major cities at risk from this natural hazard (Ganjayan, 2024). Additionally, due to the fact that a large portion of its territory is covered by mountainous areas, it also has a high potential for landslides. One of the regions exposed to natural hazards such as earthquakes and landslides is the northern part of Khuzestan Province. The counties of Andika and Izeh, located in the northern part of Khuzestan, are mountainous areas with a high density of villages and a widespread distribution of human settlements along mountain slopes and riverbanks. Many of these villages are highly vulnerable to disasters such as earthquakes and landslides due to unregulated construction, lack of resilient infrastructure, and the absence of monitoring and early warning systems. This not only threatens the lives of residents but also causes irreparable damage to natural resources, agricultural lands, transportation routes, and water sources. Since sustainable rural development requires the identification and management of environmental risks, examining and analyzing areas prone to earthquakes and landslides especially in the rural areas of Andika and Izeh counties is an inevitable necessity. This study can assist local, provincial, and national authorities in prioritizing vulnerable areas and implementing more accurate planning for infrastructure reinforcement, public education, and disaster management. Given the importance of the issue, this research focuses on identifying vulnerable areas to landslide and earthquake hazards in the counties of Izeh and Andika in Khuzestan Province.
 
Methodology
In this study, satellite imagery from CHIRPS and MODIS, the 30-meter SRTM digital elevation model, and the 1:100,000 geological digital layer of the region were used as the main data sources. The primary tools employed in this research included Google Earth Engine, ArcGIS, and IDRISI. Additionally, a combined WLC model and relative weighting coefficients were utilized. Based on the subject and objectives, the study was conducted in two main phases. In the first phase, vulnerable areas to landslides and earthquakes were identified. To detect areas prone to landslides, eight parameters were used: elevation, slope, distance from rivers, distance from roads, lithology, distance from faults, vegetation density, and average annual precipitation. For identifying earthquake-vulnerable areas, the parameters included distance from earthquake epicenters, distance from faults, lithology, and slope. After preparing the relevant data layers, they were standardized and weighted. Once the weights were applied, the data layers were imported into TerrSet software and integrated using the Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) method to produce the final vulnerability maps for both landslides and earthquakes. In the second phase, hazard maps of Izeh and Andika counties were prepared, followed by an assessment of the vulnerability status of villages in these counties against landslide and earthquake hazards.
 
Results and Discussion
According to the findings, the landslide hazard maps indicate that the eastern and northeastern parts of Izeh and Andika counties have the highest potential for landslide occurrence. This is mainly due to the presence of steep slopes, high elevations, specific geological formations, and unique hydrological conditions in these areas. The combination of these factors contributes to slope instability and a high susceptibility to landslides. Regarding earthquakes, the results show that the western parts of Izeh County and large portions of Andika County fall within areas with a high vulnerability to seismic hazards. These regions are located near active faults, and their geological structures indicate a high potential for strong earthquakes. In particular, proximity to seismogenic faults and the lack of earthquake-resistant infrastructure are among the main factors exacerbating this vulnerability.
 
Conclusion
The findings of this study indicate that a large portion of Izeh and Andika counties—particularly the eastern, northeastern, and western regions—are exposed to natural hazards such as earthquakes and landslides. Spatial analysis using the WLC method and relative weighting coefficients revealed that 85.3% of the villages in the region have a high vulnerability to earthquakes, 9.7% are highly vulnerable to landslides, and about 9% are simultaneously threatened by both hazards. This underscores the urgent need for risk-based planning and greater attention to rural infrastructure in these areas. The combination of natural factors such as slope and elevation, along with human factors such as unregulated construction and poor resource management, has increased the risk level in these regions. Furthermore, it was found that Andika County has a higher concentration of villages vulnerable to both hazards. Overall, this study highlights the value of spatial analysis in identifying high-risk areas and prioritizing risk reduction efforts, offering valuable guidance to decision-makers. Based on the results, it is recommended to implement comprehensive measures to reduce vulnerability in Izeh and Andika counties, including reinforcement of rural buildings through government support and community participation, establishment of early warning systems, public education on preparedness and disaster management, restriction of development in high-risk zones, and the use of modern technologies for continuous monitoring of faults and unstable slopes. Integrating spatial data with development planning can also lead to more accurate and effective decision-making in reducing regional vulnerability.


Keywords

Main Subjects


Abedini, M., Azadi, F., & Babaei Olom, T. (2025). Zoning of landslide occurrence risk in the Nouranchay watershed using the ANP model. Geography and Human Relations, 8(29), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.22034/gahr.2024.448417.2072 (In Persian)
Al-Dogom, D., Schuckma, K., & Al-Ruzouq, R. (2018). Geostatistical Seismic Analysis and Analysis Hazard Assessment UNITED ARAB EMIRATES. International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 3(4), 29–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W4-29-2018
Anwana, E. O., & Owojori, O. M. (2023). Analysis of Flooding Vulnerability in Informal Settlements Literature: Mapping and Research Agenda. Social Sciences, 12(1), 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010040
Chen, W., Zhao, X., & Shahabi, H. (2019). Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Geocarto International, 34, 1177–1201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1588393
Cutter, S. L., Burton, C. G., & Emrich, C. T. (2010). Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 7(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1732
Erden, T., & Karaman, H. (2012). Analysis of earthquake parameters to generate hazard maps by integrating AHP and GIS for K¨uc¨ukc¸ekmece region. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12, 475–483. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-475-2012
Gaillard, J. C., Wisner, B., & Kelman, I. (2012). The Routledge handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Handbook-of-Hazards-and-Disaster-Risk-Reduction
Ganjaeian, H. (2024). Assessment of seismicity potential of Iranian metropolises. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geographical Information (SEPEHR), 33(132), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2024.2019284.3047 (In Persian)
Ganjaeian, H. (2024). Spatial and temporal analysis of earthquakes in Iran during 1907–2023. Geography and Environmental Hazards, 13(4), 222–243. https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2024.87246.1470 (In Persian)
Ganjaeian, H., Nosrati, M., Ebrahimi, A., & Gheisarian, S. S. (2025). Assessment of the vulnerability of mountainous rural areas to natural hazards (Case study: Rural settlements of the Hawraman region). Environmental Research in Mountain Territories, 1(2), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.22034/ermr.2024.63510 (In Persian)
Ganjaeian, H., Rezaei Arefi, M., Peysoozi, T., & Emami, K. (2021). Zonning susceptible areas of landslide using WLC and OWA methods -A case study in Mountain cliff Khan, Iran. Sustainable Earth Trends, 1(2), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.52547/sustainearth.1.2.43
Ganjaeian, H., Shahjamali, M., Ebrahimi, A., & Akbarian, M. (2025). Identification of suitable areas for waste burial and disposal in Kamyaran County by applying prohibited zones. Cross-Sectoral Environment and Development, 10(87), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22034/envj.2025.500751.1458 (In Persian)
Ganjaeian, H., Yamani, M., Goorabi, M., & Maghsoudi, M. (2024). Evaluating the Impacts of Earthquake in Ezgele, Kermanshah (Iran) (Occurred on 2017/11/12). Current Research in Environmental Science and Ecology Letters, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.33140/CRESEL.01.01.06
Jamini, D., Shahabi, H., Nazari, H., & Atashbahar, R. (2023). Identification of rural settlements exposed to landslide hazards in nomadic ecosystems (Case study: Paveh County). Nomadic Territory Planning Studies, 3(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.22034/jsnap.2023.410697.1066 (In Persian)
Jena, R., Pradhan, B., & Beydoun, G. (2020). Earthquake vulnerability assessment northera sumatra province by using a multi-criteria decision-making model. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, (46), 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101518
Kanamori, H. (2008). Earthquake physics and real-time seismology. Nature 451, 271–273. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06585
Khazaei, J., & Ghaemi, M. (2015). Comparison and evaluation of landslide stabilization methods (Case study: Landslide at kilometer 194 of the Malayer–Kermanshah railway). Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 5(3), 39–53. https://ges.razi.ac.ir/article_380.html (In Persian)
Kiani, S., Karimkhani, A., & Mazidi, A. (2021). Landslide hazard zoning using logistic regression and ANFIS models in the Hashtjin watershed, Ardabil Province. Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 11(2), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.22126/ges.2021.6461.2391 (In Persian)
Li, S.Q., Qin, P.F., & Li, Y.R. (2024). Seismic vulnerability analysis of hospitals and school buildings considering the Gaussian regression algorithm. Journal of Building Engineering, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110799
Mavasati, M., Ahmadzadeh, H., & Panahi, A. (2025). Analysis of the vulnerability level of urban areas to natural hazards (earthquakes) with emphasis on the crisis management approach (Case study: Tabriz Metropolis). Geography and Planning, 29(91), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.22034/gp.2024.59712.3218 (In Persian)
Moavi, M., Alamizadeh, H., & Entezari, M. (2025). Landslide susceptibility modeling using an artificial neural network algorithm: Case study of the Shahid Abbaspour Dam watershed, northeastern Khuzestan. Geography and Environmental Hazards, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2025.92634.1557 (In Persian)
Mohammadkhan, S., Ganjaeian, H., Shahri, S., & Abbaszadeh, A. A. (2019). Prediction of urban development trends toward hazardous areas using multitemporal imagery: Case study of Marivan City. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geographical Information (SEPEHR), 28(110), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2019.36615 (In Persian)
Negahban, S., Ganjaeian, H., Ebrahimi, A., & Emami, K. (2019). Monitoring and prediction of settlement area changes using multitemporal imagery (Case study: Sonqor City). Earth and Space Physics, 45(2), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.22059/jesphys.2019.275076.1007084 (In Persian)
Negahban, S., Ganjaeian, H., Ebrahimi, A., & Gheisarian, S. S. (2024). Analysis of the role of environmental factors in flood occurrence using the Google Earth Engine system (Case study: Western Golestan Province). Geography and Environmental Planning, 35(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22108/gep.2024.142342.1659 (In Persian)
Negahban, S., Ganjaeian, H., Faridouni-Kurdistani, M., & Cheshmeh-Safidi, Z. (2019). Assessment of urban physical development and expansion toward geomorphologically prohibited areas using LCM (Case study: Sanandaj City). Natural Environmental Hazards, 8(20), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.22111/jneh.2018.21943.1317 (In Persian)
Negahban, S., Pisoozi, T., Ganjaeian, H., & Norouzi, M. (2021). Identification of areas susceptible to landslides and vertical displacement using radar imagery (Case study: Urban and peri-urban areas of Lavasan). Geography and Environmental Hazards, 10(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2021.71728.1094 (In Persian)
Neyri, H., Ganjaeian, H., & Amani, K. (2018). Assessment of environmental land suitability indices for the physical expansion of Sarvabad City by integrating network analysis and fuzzy logic models. Urban Social Geography, 5(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.22103/JUSG.2018.1961 (In Persian)
Pan, S. T., Cheng, Y.Y & Lin, C.H. (2019). Extrication time and earthquake-related mortality in the 2016 Taiwan earthquake. Formosan Medical Association, 11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2019.07.013
Pireh, M., & Ganjaeian, H. (2024). Analysis of landslides occurring in relation to environmental factors (Case study: Sanandaj County). Geography and Human Relations, 7(3), 242–278. https://doi.org/10.22034/gahr.2025.458065.2135 (In Persian)
Rezapour, A., Jabbari, I., & Bahrami, K. (2023). The effect of groundwater on the landslide of the southern slope of Shahneshin Mountain. Physical Geography Research, 55(3), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2023.364630.1007788 (In Persian)
Safaipour, M., Maleki, S., Ghaedi, S., & Ebrahimi, A. (2024). Analysis and proposal of a physical development pattern for Izeh City with emphasis on natural hazards. Crisis Management, 13(4), 21–35. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23453915.1403.13.4.2.9 (In Persian)
Safarinamivandi, M., Ganjaeian, H., Nosrati, M., & Mohammadian, K. (2024). Identification of flooded areas and analysis of factors affecting their occurrence (Case study: Southeastern Sistan and Baluchestan Province). Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 13(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.22034/gmpj.2024.449586.1494 (In Persian)
Salari, M., Neyri, H., Ganjaeian, H., & Amani, K. (2018). Site selection of suitable directions for the urban development of Kamyaran using a hazard-oriented approach based on the application of geomorphological prohibited zones. Environmental Hazards Management, 4(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhsci.2018.252694.341 (In Persian)
Salari, M., Neyri, H., Ganjaeian, H., & Amani, K. (2020). Assessment and prediction of the physical development trend of settlements with emphasis on the geomorphological approach and environmental management (Case study: Paveh City). Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 9(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.22034/gmpj.2020.109536 (In Persian)
Sarris, A., Loupasakis, C., Soupios, P., Trigkas, V., & Vallianatos, F. (2010). Earthquake vulnerability and seismic risk assessment of urban areas in high seismic regions: Application to chania city, crete island, greece. Natural Hazards, 54 (2), 395-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11069-009-9475-Z
Sharifi, H., Ramezanipour, M., & Ebrahimi, L. (2024). Investigation of urban spatial development in response to environmental hazards (Case study: Noor County). Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 24(75), 354–377. https://doi.org/10.61186/jgs.24.75.4 (In Persian)
Su, Q., Weiheng, T., Shiguang, M., Xiaoyuan, Zh., Kaixin, L., Xiaoye, S., Jianli, G., & Yonggang, Y. (2021). Landslide Susceptibility Zoning Using C5. 0 Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine and Comparison of Their Performance in a Coal Mine Area. Frontiers in Earth Science, 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.918386
Tabesh, S., Nouri Khanyordi, M., Dousti, M., & Ganjaeian, H. (2020). Presenting a proposed model for locating sports facilities using an integrated WLC and AHP model (Case study: Tabriz City). Sport Management and Development, 9(21), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.22124/jsmd.2020.4096 (In Persian)
Vahdat, K., Smith, N. J., & Amiri, G. G. (2014). Fuzzy multicriteria for developing a risk management system in seismically prone areas. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 48 (4), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPS.2014.05.002
Wang, W., Zhang, W., & Xia, Q. (2012). Landslide Risk Zoning Based on Contribution Rate Weight Stack Method. International Conference on Future Energy. Environment, and Materials. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.01.030
Yariyan, P., Rezaei, M., & Alavi Panah, S. K. (2020). A spatial multi-criteria evaluation model to seismic vulnerability assessment using GIS: A case study. Environmental Earth Sciences, 79(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-8820-1
Zandmoghadam, M. R. (2023). Zoning the city based on vulnerability to natural hazards (Case study: Nasim Shahr). Geography and Environmental Studies, 12(46), 60–77. https://journals.iau.ir/article_697723.html (In Persian)
Zhang, X., Xie, H., Xu, Z, Li, Z., & Chen, B. (2024). Evaluating landslide susceptibility: an AHP method-based approach enhanced with optimized random forest modeling. Natural Hazards, 120, 8153–8207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06306-1
Zheng, D., Fang, Q., Lei, D., Wang, Z., Yan, C., & Rong, Z. (2024). Large-scale geohazards risk of submarine landslides considering the subsea cables vulnerability: A case study from the northern continental slopes of South China Sea. Engineering Geology, 343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107788
Zhou, J., Tan, Sh., Li, J., Xu, J., Wang, Ch., & Ye, H. (2023). Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): A Case Study of a Construction Site for Photovoltaic Power Generation in Yunxian County, Southwest China. Sustainability, 15(6), 51-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su15065281