Evaluation of the Physical Development Trend of Urban Spaces Located in Mountainous Areas in Relation to Environmental Hazards (Case Study: Ilam City)

Document Type : applied research

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Geomorphology, University of Police Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 PhD Student, Department of Geomorphology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 PhD, Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

4 M.A, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Malayer Azad University, Malayer, Iran

Abstract

Natural hazards are among the challenges facing many cities, including Ilam. The location of the city of Iran in the Zagros belt and leading to the mountain unit has caused this city to have a high vulnerability potential against natural hazards such as earthquakes and landslides. Due to the importance of the topic, in this research, the physical development process of Ilam city towards hazardous areas has been evaluated in recent years. In this research, Landsat satellite images, SRTM 30 meters high digital model, the layer related to the epicenter of the earthquakes and other layers of information are used as the most important research data. The most important research tools are ArcGIS, TerrSet and ENVI. In this research, the vulnerable areas against earthquake and landslide hazards have been identified first, and then the development process of the residential areas of this city towards vulnerable areas during the years 1992 to 2022 has been evaluated. Based on the results, a large part of the urban area of Ilam, including its northern and eastern regions, are exposed to the dangers of earthquakes and landslides. Also, the results of this research have shown that the city of Ilam in 1992 had an area of about 7.3 square kilometers, of which about 5.6 square kilometers were in the high risk of vulnerability class. Also, in 2022, it had an area of about 17.8 square kilometers, of which about 11.5 square kilometers was in the high risk of vulnerability category. According to the obtained results, during the recent years, a large part of the constructions of Ilam city have been done in areas with high risk of dangerousness.
 
Extended Abstract
 
Introduction
One of the most important challenges for the progress of societies, especially urban areas, has been the increase in the risk process. Hazards can be of natural or human origin, and different regions have different potentials for the occurrence of various hazards according to their geographical location and political, economic and social conditions. Due to the importance of the subject, today many scientists and urban planners pay attention to the monitoring of environmental changes in urban areas. According to its geographical location, Iran has a high potential in the field of hazards, especially natural hazards. Every year, natural hazards in Iran cause a lot of human and financial losses, which is very effective in slowing down the country's development process. Different regions of Iran, especially its urban areas, have different potentials in the field of various risks, and it is necessary to pay special attention to this important issue in different programs, especially construction planning. Ilam city is one of the areas exposed to natural hazards. The location of the city of Ilam in the Zagros belt and leading to the mountain unit has caused this city to have a high vulnerability potential against natural hazards such as earthquakes and landslides. Considering that the dangers of earthquakes and landslides are always associated with many human and financial losses, therefore, in this research, the physical development process of Ilam city towards the hazardous areas during recent years has been evaluated.
 
Methodology
This research is based on descriptive-analytical and quantitative methods. In this research, Landsat satellite images, SRTM 30 meters high digital model, the layer related to the epicenter of the earthquakes and other layers of information are used as the most important research data. The most important research tools are ArcGIS (to prepare the desired maps), TerrSet (To do the OWA model) and ENVI (to prepare the land use map of the region). According to the desired goals, this research has been done in 4 stages. In the first stage, vulnerable areas against earthquakes have been identified. In the second stage, vulnerable areas against landslides have been identified. In the third stage, a map of the region's vulnerability has been prepared, and for this purpose, the high and very high vulnerability potential classes of the studied hazards have been combined, and in this way, a map of the areas exposed to natural hazards has been prepared. In the fourth stage, using Landsat satellite images and through ENVI software, a map of the urban area of Ilam during the years 1992 and 2022 has been prepared. After preparing the map of the residential areas, the distribution of these areas in the areas exposed to earthquake and landslide hazards during the years 1992 and 2022 has been analyzed.
 
Results and Discussion
Due to the fact that the risk of earthquake is always associated with a lot of loss of life and money, it is very important to identify the areas exposed to this risk. The location of Ilam city has caused this city to have a high seismic potential. Based on the results, the northern and eastern regions of Ilam urban area have a higher vulnerability potential against earthquake risk due to the type of lithology, high slope and proximity to the epicenters of earthquakes that occurred in the region. is Also, due to the fact that the city of Ilam is surrounded by mountains, parts of the peripheral areas of this city are at risk of landslides. Due to the importance of the topic, in this section, the vulnerable areas against the risk of landslides have been identified in the urban area and urban outskirts of Ilam, and based on the results, the eastern, northeastern and southeastern parts of Ilam due to Leading to the mountain unit, the high slope and the existence of communication lines have a high potential in terms of the occurrence of landslide hazards.
 
Conclusion
The location of Ilam city has caused this city to have a high risk potential. The results of this research have shown that a large part of the city of Ilam and especially its northern regions have a high vulnerability potential against earthquakes due to the proximity to the earthquake epicenters, the type of lithology and the high slope. Also, the mountainous location of Ilam city has caused the northern and eastern parts of this city to be at risk of landslides. According to the mentioned cases, under the influence of the natural condition of Ilam city, earthquake and landslide hazards are among the most important hazards facing this city. In this research, the development process of the residential areas of Ilam city towards hazardous areas has been evaluated. According to the results, the city of Ilam in 1992 had an area of about 7.3 square kilometers, of which about 5.6 square kilometers was in the high risk of vulnerability category. Also, in 2022, it had an area of about 17.8 square kilometers, of which about 11.5 square kilometers was in the high risk of vulnerability category. According to the results, in recent years, a large part of the constructions in Ilam city have been done in areas with a high risk of dangerousness, which shows that the environmental strength of the region and especially the vulnerability of the region have not been paid attention.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Amirian, Sohrab; Safaei-Pour, Masoud; Hosseini Amini, Hassan and Ebadi, Hossein (2019). Zoning of safety and vulnerability in the city of Ahvaz from the perspective of passive defense. Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 20 (56), 309-299. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22287736.1399.20.56.19.0 (In Persian)
  2. Asadi, Masoumeh; Heydari, Zahra and Emami, Kamyar (2014). Evaluation of the physical development trend of Pol-e-Dokhtar city towards flood-prone areas. Geography and Environmental Hazards, 11(2), 174-159. https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2021.72169.1101 (In Persian)
  3. Bagan, H., & Yamagata, Y. (2012). Landsat analysis of urban growth: How Tokyo became the world's largest megacity during the last 40 years. Remote Sensing of Environment, 127, 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.09.011
  4. Baharvand, Siamak. (1402). Landslide susceptibility assessment using frequency ratio models and fuzzy logic (case study: Khorramabad-Arak freeway). Geography and Environmental Hazards, 12(1), 116-103. https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2022.75264.1201 (In Persian)
  5. Bakkensen, L. A., Lent, C., Laura, K., Read, L. K., & Linkov, I. (2016). Validating resilience and vulnerability indices in the context of natural disasters. Risk Analysis, 37(5), 982–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12677
  6. Chini, M., Pelich, R., Pulvirenti, L., Pierdicca, N., Hostache, R., & Matgen, P. (2019). Sentinel-1 InSAR coherence to detect floodwater in urban areas: Houston and Hurricane Harvey as a test case. Remote Sensing, 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11020107
  7. Ebrahimi, Majid; Zakarian, Ahmad; Davodian, Javad and Mirahmadi, Abolghasem (2017). Analysis of stability and solutions for stabilizing landslides (case study: Khorramabad-Pol-Zal Expressway). Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 7(4), 1-17. https://ges.razi.ac.ir/article_867.html (In Persian)
  8. Fekete, A. (2022). Peri-urban growth into natural hazard-prone areas: Mapping exposure transformation of the built environment in Nairobi and Nyeri, Kenya, from 1948 to today. Natural Hazards, 119, 859–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05515-4
  9. Galster, G., Hanson, R., Ratcliffe, M. R., Wolman, H., Coleman, S., & Freihage, J. (2001). Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate, 12(4), 681–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2001.9521426
  10. Ganjaeian, H., Rezaei Arefi, M., Peysoozi, T., & Emami, K. (2021). Zonning susceptible areas of landslide using WLC and OWA methods -A case study in Mountain cliff Khan, Iran. Sustainable Earth Trends, 1(2), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.52547/sustainearth.1.2.43
  11. Ganjaeian, H., Yamani, M., Goorabi, M., & Maghsudi, M. (2024). Evaluating the impacts of earthquake in Ezgele, Kermanshah (Iran) (occurred on 2017/11/12). Current Research in Environmental Science and Ecology Letters, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.33140/CRESEL.01.01.06
  12. Ganjaeian, Hamid (2010). Geomorphological hazards of urban areas, study methods and control strategies. Entebbe Publishing, 144 pages. https://www.gisoom.com/book/11628118 (In Persian)
  13. Ganjaeian, Hamid (2014). Identification of areas prone to sinkholes using radar images (case study: Qorveh Plain). Environmental Erosion Research, 14 (2), 105-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.61186/jeer.14.2.6 (In Persian)
  14. Ganjaeian, Hamid; Akbarian, Morteza and Abbaszadeh, Amirali (2019). Evaluating the role of geomorphological hazards in the physical development process of cities (case study: Qorveh city). Urban Planning and Architecture of Environmental Identity, 1(1), 1-14. https://www.ei-journal.ir/article_96115.html (In Persian)
  15. Ganjaian, Hamid; Nosrati, Mojgan; Ebrahimi, Atrin and Gheysarian, Seyed Saadi (2015). Evaluating the vulnerability of villages in mountainous areas to natural hazards (case study: villages in the Oraman region). Environmental Research in Mountainous Regions, 1(2), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.22034/ermr.2024.63510 (In Persian)
  16. Gibson, T., Pelling, M., Ghosh, A., Matyas, D., Siddiqi, A., Solecki, W., Johnson, L., Kenney, C., Johnston, D., & Du Plessis, R. (2016). Pathways for transformation: Disaster risk management to enhance resilience to extreme events. Journal of Extreme Events, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345737616710020
  17. Hassan, M. D., Anzum, N., Shaibur, M. R., Nahar, N., Akber, A., Hossain, Md. S., & Al Mamun, S. (2023). Changing dynamics of river ecosystem from aquatic to terrestrial: A case of Bhairab River, Jashore, Bangladesh. Watershed Ecology and the Environment, 5(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsee.2023.05.001
  18. Herryal, Z. A., Yustiningrum, E., Andriana, N., Sagala, A., & Anggun, M. S. (2017). Measuring community resilience to natural hazards: Case study of Yogyakarta Province. In Disaster risk reduction in Indonesia (pp. 609–633). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54466-3_25
  19. Jamini, Davud; Shahabi, Hayman; Nazari, Hamid and Atashbahar, Ramin (2010). Identification of rural settlements at risk of landslides in nomadic ecosystems (case study: Paveh County). Studies on the Planning of Nomadic Territories, 3 (5), 122-107. https://doi.org/10.22034/jsnap.2023.410697.1066 (In Persian)
  20. Jha, K., Miner, W., & Geddes, S. (2012). Building urban resilience: Principles, tools, and practice. The World Bank. https://ideas.repec.org/b/wbk/wbpubs/13109.html
  21. Kiani, Shokrolah; Karimkhani, Akram and Mazedi, Ahmad (2014). Landslide hazard zoning using logistic regression model and ANFIS in Hashtjin watershed of Ardabil province. Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 11 (2), 73-55. https://doi.org/10.22126/ges.2021.6461.2391 (In Persian)
  22. Lalehpour, Manijeh; Esmailpour, Manijeh and Pahlavani, Farzaneh (2016). Studying the physical development of Khorramabad city with emphasis on the city's internal development indicators. Rural Settlement Planning Studies, 16 (4), 934-919. https://www.sid.ir/paper/1031157/fa (In Persian)
  23. Lewis, D., & Jaana, M. (2005). Urban vulnerability and good government. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 13(2), 50–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2005.00456.x
  24. Malaki, Saeed and Ebrahimi. Azam (2014). Evaluating the trend of physical development of residential areas using satellite images (Case study: Hendijan city). Geography and Development, 21 (72), 177-166. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2023.44445.3483 (In Persian)
  25. Malalgoda, C., Amaratunga, R. D. G., & Pathirage, C. P. (2010). Exploring disaster risk reduction in the built environment. School of the Built Environment, University of Salford, UK. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/15204_16141
  26. Mas, J. F., Kolb, M., Paegelow, M., & Camacho Olmedo, M. T. (2014). Inductive pattern-based land use/cover change models: A comparison of four software packages. Environmental Modelling & Software, 51, 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.010
  27. Mohammad Khan, Shirin; Ganjaian, Hamid; Shahri, Somayeh and Abbaszadeh, Amir Ali (2019). Predicting the trend of urban development towards risky areas using multi-temporal images (Case study: Marivan city). Sepehr, 28 (110), 117-107. https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2019.36615 (In Persian)
  28. Momani, Mustafa and Mostafavi, Najmeh Sadat (2019). Spatial analysis of the physical development planning model of cities in Markazi province. Urban Social Geography, 6(1), 225-213. https://www.doi.org/10.22103/JUSG.2019.1987 (In Persian)
  29. Movasati, Mustafa; Ahmadzadeh, Hassan and Panahi, Ali. (1404). An analysis of the vulnerability level of urban areas against natural hazards "earthquake" with emphasis on the crisis management approach (case study: Tabriz metropolis). Geography and Planning, 29(91). 243-218. https://doi.org/10.22034/gp.2024.59712.3218 (In Persian)
  30. Nagheban, Saeed; Ganjaian, Hamid; Ebrahimi, Atrin and Gheysarian, Seyed-Saadi (2017). Analyzing the role of environmental factors in the occurrence of floods using Google Earth Engine (case study: West Golestan Province). Geography and Environmental Planning, 35(4), 18-1. https://doi.org/10.22108/gep.2024.142342.1659 (In Persian)
  31. Nagheban, Saeed; Pi-Suzi, Tina; Ganjaian, Hamid and Norouzi, Milad (2017). Identifying areas prone to landslides and vertical displacement using radar images (case study: urban area and urban outskirts of Lavasan). Geography and Environmental Hazards, 10(3), 18-1. https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2021.71728.1094 (In Persian)
  32. Negahban, Saeed; Ganjaian, Hamid; Fereydouni‌Kordestani, Mozhdeh and Cheshme Sefidi, Ziba (2019). Evaluation of physical development of cities and expansion towards geomorphologically prohibited areas using LCM (Case study: Sanandaj city). Natural Environment Hazards, 8(20), 52-39. https://doi.org/10.22111/jneh.2018.21943.1317 (In Persian)
  33. Negahban, Saeed; Ganjaian, Hamid; Saeedi, Shahla and Ghasemi, Afshan (2019). Study of vertical displacement resulting from the 17/8/98 Turkmanchay earthquake using InSAR method, Earth and Space Physics, 46‌(3), 456-445. https://doi.org/10.22059/jesphys.2020.295046.1007182 (In Persian)
  34. Notti, D., Giordan, D., Caló, F., Pepe, A., Zucca, F., & Galve, J. P. (2018). Potential and limitations of open satellite data for flood mapping. Remote Sensing, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10111673
  35. Noureddin Moussa, Fatemeh; Mahmoudi, Reza and Emami, Kamyar (2013). Evaluation of the physical development trend of residential areas towards flood-prone areas (Case study: Sanandaj city). Geography and Human Relations, 5(4), 664-653. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26453851.1402.5.4.35.0 (In Persian)
  36. Parhi, P. K. (2018). Flood management in Mahanadi Basin using HEC-RAS and Gumbel’s extreme value distribution. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India), 99(4), 751–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-018-0317-4
  37. Pireh, Mahin and Ganjaeian, Hamid (1403). Analysis of landslides in relation to environmental factors (case study: Sanandaj city). Geography and Human Relations, 7 (3), 278-242. https://doi.org/10.22034/gahr.2025.458065.2135 (In Persian)
  38. Qaedrahmati, Safar; Khadem-al-Hosseini, Ahmad and Siavoshi, Tahereh (2013). Analysis of the risk of earthquake hazard in urban settlements of Lorestan province. Geography and Urban-Regional Planning, 9‌(3), 14-1. https://doi.org/10.22111/gaij.2014.1385 (In Persian)
  39. Salari, Mamand; Nayiri, Hadi; Ganjaeian, Hamid and Amani, Khabat (2010). Evaluation and prediction of physical development trends of residential areas with emphasis on geomorphological approach and environmental management (case study: Paveh city). Quantitative Geomorphology Research, 9 (1), 101-86. https://doi.org/10.22034/gmpj.2020.109536 (In Persian)
  40. Zhang, X., Xie, H., Xu, Z, Li, Z., & Chen, B. (2024). Evaluating landslide susceptibility: an AHP method-based approach enhanced with optimized random forest modeling. Natural Hazards, 120, 8153–8207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06306-1
  41. Zhou, J., Tan, Sh., Li, J., Xu, J., Wang, Ch., & Ye, H. (2023). Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): A Case Study of a Construction Site for Photovoltaic Power Generation in Yunxian County, Southwest China. Sustainability, 15(6), 51-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su15065281