Assessing the Performance of Vegetation Indices in Drought Analysis Using Remote Sensing Techniques (Case Study: Kurdistan Province)

Document Type : applied research

Authors

1 MA, Department of Climatology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

2 PhD, Department of Natural Geography, Faculty of Geographical Sciences and Planning, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran (Secretary of Geography, Education and Training of Sanandaj District 2)

Abstract

Drought is a natural phenomenon that can have detrimental effects on vegetation cover and agricultural activities. This study investigates the impact of drought on vegetation cover in Kurdistan Province, Iran, from 2000 to 2022, employing the remote sensing indices NDVI, EVI, and VCI. Vegetation cover data was extracted from MODIS satellite imagery and analyzed using the Google Earth Engine platform. The findings reveal significant changes in the distribution of vegetation cover classes (dense, moderate, weak, and no cover) over the study period. In 2020, the largest area was covered by the dense vegetation class (45.43%), while the smallest area was covered by weak vegetation cover (0.2%). In contrast, in 2004, the smallest area was covered by dense vegetation cover (3.25%), and the largest area was covered by weak vegetation cover (19.19%). In terms of drought, the study period experienced droughts of varying intensities. The years 2020 and 2012 had the least drought (with 95.43% and 67.75% of the area without drought, respectively), while the years 2004 and 2022 had the most drought (with 18.09% and 47.60% of the area without drought, respectively). A significant correlation was observed between dense vegetation cover and decreased drought severity. Years with the largest dense vegetation cover area (such as 2020) experienced the least drought, while years with an increase in weak vegetation cover area (such as 2004) witnessed an increase in drought severity.
 
Extended Abstract
 
Introduction
Drought is a complex and slow-onset natural phenomenon that negatively affects human activities, ecosystems, and economic development, impacting various societies across the globe. It manifests in different forms, including meteorological, agricultural, hydrological, and socio-economic droughts, each reflecting a distinct aspect of water scarcity. Population growth, economic development, and land-use changes intensify the impacts of drought and make water resource management increasingly challenging. The wide geographical extent of drought and its influence on diverse regions highlight the necessity of accurate and continuous monitoring. Traditional drought monitoring methods, which mainly rely on precipitation data, face limitations such as inadequate spatial and temporal coverage and low accuracy. In this context, remote sensing technology has emerged as an innovative approach, enabling the collection of extensive and simultaneous data while overcoming many of the shortcomings of conventional methods. This technology serves as a valuable tool for managing natural resources, particularly water resources, under conditions of stress and scarcity.
 
Methodology
This study aimed to monitor drought and analyze vegetation cover changes in Kurdistan Province during 2000–2022 using NDVI, EVI, and VCI indices derived from MOD09GA data of the MODIS sensor. Calculations were performed in the Google Earth Engine environment, and the results were classified into four vegetation cover categories (dense, moderate, sparse, and bare). Vegetation distribution and drought severity maps were generated in ArcGIS Pro, and temporal trends were analyzed. Finally, the relationship between dense vegetation changes and drought severity was statistically evaluated, revealing significant correlations between these variables.
 
Results and Discussion
In this study, in order to examine vegetation changes and drought conditions in Kurdistan Province, May images from 2000 to 2022 were analyzed using NDVI, EVI, and VCI indices. Due to minimal changes in some years, only 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020, and 2022, which showed the most significant variations, were selected for detailed analysis. Results from NDVI and EVI indicated notable fluctuations in vegetation cover over the study period, with varying proportions of dense, moderate, sparse, and non-vegetated areas; for instance, in 2004 the dense vegetation class had relatively high coverage, whereas in 2022 it experienced a significant decline. Drought assessment using VCI revealed that the region experienced varying degrees of moderate to severe drought, with certain years, such as 2007, showing no severe drought, while in more recent years drought distribution increased. Correlation analysis between NDVI and EVI with VCI showed a positive and significant relationship between vegetation changes and drought intensity (0.515 and 0.460, respectively). These findings suggest that vegetation dynamics can serve as an effective indicator for monitoring and assessing drought conditions in Kurdistan Province.
 
Conclusion
The results of the vegetation indices indicated that, over the study period, significant changes occurred in the distribution of vegetation classes (dense, moderate, sparse, and non-vegetated). In 2020, the largest area was covered by dense vegetation (45.43%) and the smallest by sparse vegetation (0.2%). In contrast, in 2004, the smallest area was under dense vegetation (3.25%) and the largest under sparse vegetation (19.19%). From a drought perspective, varying intensities of drought occurred throughout the study period. The years 2020 and 2012 experienced the lowest drought levels (with 95.43% and 67.75% of the area without drought, respectively), whereas 2004 and 2022 had the highest drought levels (with 18.09% and 47.60% of the area without drought, respectively). A significant correlation was observed between dense vegetation and reduced drought intensity; years with the highest dense vegetation coverage (such as 2020) experienced the lowest drought, while years with increased sparse vegetation (such as 2004) corresponded with higher drought intensity.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Burnet, A. W. (1993). Size variations and long wave circulation within the January Northern Hemisphere circumpolar vortex 1946–80. Journal of Climate, 6(10), 1914-1920. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006%3C1914:SVALWC%3E2.0.CO;2
  2. Du, L., Tian, Q., Yu, T., Meng, Q., Jancso, T., Udvardy, P., & Huang, Y. (2013). A comprehensive drought monitoring method integrating MODIS and TRMM data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 23, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.09.010
  3. Fazel Dehkordi, Leila; Sohrabi, Tayyebeh El-Sadat; Ghanavizbaf, Mohammad Hossein, and Ghazawi, Reza (2016). Drought monitoring using MODIS images in dry areas: a case study of rangelands of Isfahan province. Geography and Environmental Planning, 27(3), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.22108/gep.2017.98067 (In Persian)
  4. Hagman, G. (1984). Prevention better than cure: Report on human and natural disasters in the Third World. Swedish Red Cross, Stockholm, Sweden. https://kohahq.searo.who.int/bib/1479
  5. Himanshu, S. K., Singh, G., & Kharola, N. (2015). Monitoring of drought using satellite data. International Research Journal of Earth Sciences, 3(1), 66–72. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281208345_Monitoring_of_Drought_using_Satellite_Data
  6. Huete, A. R., Liu, H., Batchily, Q. K., & Van Leeuwen, W. J. D. A. (1997). A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment, 59, 440–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00112-5
  7. Kazempour-Chorasi, Sima; Erfanian, Mehdi, and Ebadi-Nahari, Zahra (2019). Evaluation of MODIS and TRMM satellite data in drought monitoring of Lake Urmia basin. Geography and Environmental Planning, 30(74), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.22108/gep.2019.115381.1115 (In Persian)
  8. Khoshakhlaq, Faramarz (2008). Research on widespread droughts in Iran using synoptic analysis, PhD thesis, Physical Geography, University of Tabriz. (In Persian)
  9. Kogan, F. N. (1997). Global drought watch from space. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78, 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<0621:GDWFS>2.0.CO;2
  10. Maedanchi, Peyman; Shahedi, Kaka; Habibnejad, Mahmoud; Soleimani, Karim and Fatehi-Marj, Ahmad (2019). Zoning of climatic droughts and drought magnitude using SPI index and geostatistical Kriging method (Case study: Kerman Province). Iranian Irrigation and Water Engineering, 10(2), 205-228. https://doi.org/10.22125/iwe.2019.100753 (In Persian)
  11. Mirmousavi, Seyed Hossein and Karimi, Hamideh (2013). Study of the effect of drought on vegetation using MODIS sensor images Case: Province Kurdistan. Geography and Development, 11(31), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2013.794 (In Persian)
  12. Mishra, A. K., & Singh, V. P. (2010). A review of drought concepts. Journal of Hydrology, 391, 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.012
  13. Mohit Esfahani, Pouria; Soltani, Saeed; Modares, Reza and Pourmanafi, Saeed (2019). Evaluation of MSDI Multivariate Drought Index and Meteorological-Agro-Drought Monitoring in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province. Soil and Water Sciences, 24 (3), 33-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/jwss.24.3.42111 (In Persian)
  14. Rahnama, Samira; Shahidi, Ali; Yaghoubzadeh, Mustafa and Mehran, Ali Akbar (2002). Determining drought status using remote sensing and meteorological and agricultural drought indicators in regions with different climates. Iranian Soil and Water Research, 53(10), 2383-2398. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijswr.2022.348275.669352 (In Persian)
  15. Saedian, Hamzeh (2014). A comprehensive review of applied drought indicators. Integrated Watershed Management, 2(3), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.22034/iwm.2022.559192.1039 (In Persian)
  16. Salimifard, Mozhdeh; Sana’inejad, Seyed Hossein; Sepehr, Adel, and Sabet Dizavandi, Leila (2018). Drought Monitoring Based on Satellite-Determined Index (SDI) and TRMM Sensor Data (Case Study: Khorasan Razavi Province), Newar Journal, 42(102), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.30467/nivar.2018.125918.1085 (In Persian)
  17. Savari, Muslim; Femi Hossein, Shaban Ali; Irvani, Houshang and Asadi, Ali (2019), Modeling the effects of drought on the sustainable livelihood of small-scale farmers in rural settlements of Kurdistan province. Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards, 6 (2), 111-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/jsaeh.6.2.111 (In Persian)
  18. Shakya, N., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2006). Drought monitoring using vegetation and LST in Nepal and Northeastern India. Proceedings of the Conference of the Remote Sensing Society of Japan, 203–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160902902617
  19. Sobhani, Behrouz; Jafarzadeh Aliabad, Leila and Safarian Zangir, Vahid (2019). Modeling, analysis and forecasting of drought phenomenon in Iran. Hydrogeomorphology, 6(21), 181-202. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23833254.1398.6.21.9.4 (In Persian)
  20. Soleimani, Karim; Darvishi, Shadman and Shokrian, Fatemeh (2019). Agricultural Drought Analysis Using Remote Sensing Indices (Case Study: Marivan County). Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems in Natural Resources, 2(10), 33-15. https://dorl.net/dor/http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26767082.1398.10.2.2.1 (In Persian)
  21. Statistical Yearbook of Kurdistan Province (2002). Kurdistan Management and Planning Organization, Deputy for Statistics and Information. (In Persian)
  22. Sultani, Milad; Soltani, Adel; Kalehoi, Mahin and Soleimani, Karim (2019). Regional drought monitoring using Landsat images - Study area: Kermanshah city. "Sepehr" Geographic Information Scientific and Research Quarterly, 28(109), 137-146. https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2019.35643 (In Persian)
  23. Talebi, Mohammad Sadeq and Mousavi Bafroei, Mahnaz (2010). Zoning and drought monitoring assessment using valid indicators, case study of Kerman province, First International Conference on Plant, Water, Soil and Air Modeling, Kerman. https://civilica.com/doc/97456 (In Persian)
  24. Tucker, C. J. (1979). Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8(2), 127–1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0
  25. Wilhite, D. A. (2000). Drought: A global assessment (Vol. 2). Routledge.
  26. Wilhite, D. A., & Glantz, M. H. (1985). Understanding the drought phenomenon: The role of definitions. Water International, 10(3), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508068508686328